Talk:Mike Jackson (Australian entertainer)

Requested move 4 June 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus and withdrawn by nominator &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

MikeJackson → Mike Jackson (Australian musical artist) – Why is there no space in the page name between Mike and Jackson? The slot for Mike Jackson was occupied when this page was created, but it should have a properly disambiguated title. The article does not mention that "MikeJackson" is a stylized stage name or something similar, so let's move the page. De728631 (talk) 23:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Anarchyte  (work  &#124; talk )   01:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Striking my comment. I think entertainer is a fine enough disambiguation for this person.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The scope of the discussion has changed: the name now is Mike Jackson (Australian entertainer), following a rename of Mike Jackson (British Army officer) and creation of a Mike Jackson disambiguation page. The question is if Mike Jackson is more of an Australian entertainer or a Australian musical artist. I have no position about that. --Robertiki (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * And sorry for having caught a launched renaming discussion. --Robertiki (talk) 10:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm withdrawing the move request since a proper disambiguation has been performed. One could argue about the merits of "musical artist" vs "entertainer" but I think for now we can just leave the page as it is. De728631 (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.