Talk:Mike Junkin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Go Phightins! (talk · contribs) 01:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I will review this article.  Go  Phightins  !  01:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Not too much of which to speak here. A few prose adjustments and clarifications may be warranted, but other than that, we are pretty much good.


 * Is there any reason cannot be rephrased/made more concise to ? It just seems a little ... verbose.
 * Was he recruited by anyone else? Did he pick Duke for any particular reason?
 * In reference number 4, can you include the location of the newspaper?
 * It might help to clarify that defenses typically start three or four linebackers to help non-football fans.
 * Can we tweak it to ?
 * to
 * What the heck is "a lack of great plays"? Seems a little bizarre.
 * Um. What is a combine test? Is there a combine that isn't the Scouting Combine? Did you perhaps mean a drug test?
 * to
 * And you said there are no sources on his post-football career, correct? No free images either, I assume? So, I think it's just those few quibbles. Good job.  Go  Phightins  !  02:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Issues fixed, thanks for the review. It doesn't look like any other colleges tried to recruit him, but then again pre-internet recruitment was way more behind the scenes. Nothing post-career whatsoever, even on where he might be residing nowadays. Not sure how to reword fully the great plays thing since that's what the source said. I changed it to impact plays which makes more sense, if that still doesn't fit I can just remove that part since the missed tackles were the crux of the criticism. Wizardman  02:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it looks good. Passing.  Go  Phightins  !  02:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)