Talk:Mike McGrady

Bias and Unencyclopedic Tone?
I'm not sure how to do this, so I'm sorry if I'm missing anything I'm supposed to do. However, when I saw this article and took a quick glance, I noticed that a lot of the article's content isn't in an encyclopedic tone and seems to be biased in some aspects (for example, "was the mastermind behind Naked Came the Stranger," could be rewritten as "was responsible for Naked Came the Stranger")

I'm also not sure how to edit the page myself to fix the tone issues, thank you if you do read this and choose to respond.

SarasvatiMeltout (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I saw this article yesterday and also was very unsatisfied with it—in addition to the unencyclopedic tone, the article also seemed to lack any real structure at all. I felt the only thing I could do was restart it from scratch, so with the exception of the unsourced bibliography (which I'll try to go through at a later time), that is what I did, though I used most of the same sources that the old version of the article did.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)