Talk:Mike Oldfield's Single

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Mike Oldfield's Single. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080418013435/http://www.rainer-muenz.de:80/oldfield/ to http://www.rainer-muenz.de/oldfield/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060527010713/http://www.oldfield.de:80/froggy.htm to http://www.oldfield.de/froggy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 15 August 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Mike Oldfield's Single → Tubular Bells (Now the Original Theme from The Exorcist) – This song, which is from the movie The Exorcist, is not the same as the other song “Mike Oldfield's Single”, which is a very different song. AdamDeanHall (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose as proposed. Terrible title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose, as there's currently no need for disambiguation. If the article is split into separate articles about the American and British singles, then a disambiguated title may be appropriate, but that isn't the case at the moment. Tevildo (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)