Talk:Mike Stone (British Army officer)

Neutrality issues and puffery
The problem I have with the article as it stands is that the reliable sources that talk about Stone seem to favour describing him as "a former Serco employee", which is significantly less than what the current lead claims he's done. I'm happy to accept that being the Chief Information Officer of the MoD, with coverage in sources, is acceptable for an article, but frankly if I had a dog it would probably bark at this article for being written by someone with a conflict of interest. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   — Preceding undated comment added 11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Stone (defence). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714205025/http://www.veterans-uk.info/20140305-VetsUK%20website%20announcement-U.pdf to http://www.veterans-uk.info/20140305-VetsUK%20website%20announcement-U.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)