Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Lead expanded, see how it works now. Commonscat moved.
 * The lead is still shorter than I would like but since there is a limited history to the aircraft, I'll tick this off.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Done.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Passed. A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Good work. Harrison49 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Passed. A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Good work. Harrison49 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Passed. A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Good work. Harrison49 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Passed. A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Good work. Harrison49 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)