Talk:Milagro (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria I have to say, this probably ranks among my least favourite episodes of any television show.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Given things a light copy-edit to fix anything I saw wrong. I've simplified down some of the figures listed—9.0 is the same as 9, for example.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * Seems grand. I made some changes to ref 12, as it's better to add navigational notes in a manner that looks deliberate—sticking them in the title field can lead to them being overlooked.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * Not keen on how brief the "reception" part of "Broadcast and reception" is. I have a review for it in the Shearman and Pearson book I'll add, and I think there has been mention of this episode in some of the articles we've cited before. I'll take a check through those today.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral/unbiased.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * History is uncontroversial, article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Images are mostly fine. One is commons (and I can think of another article I'd like to use that in so I'm glad I saw it here); the non-free one could perhaps mention why that scene is "poignant" (it's already mentioned in its caption so it's not a big issue).
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Going to put this one on hold for now. The crit 3 work I'll handle but I want to be sure the review is sorted before I start adding information to the article. Aside from that it should be good to pass. GRAPPLE   X  17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, cool, I'll sort through some of the articles we've used to see if I've missed something.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Added the Shearman and Pearson review, found some other stuff online too. Looking much more rounded now, so I'm going to pass this one. Well done. GRAPPLE   X  18:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Going to put this one on hold for now. The crit 3 work I'll handle but I want to be sure the review is sorted before I start adding information to the article. Aside from that it should be good to pass. GRAPPLE   X  17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, cool, I'll sort through some of the articles we've used to see if I've missed something.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Added the Shearman and Pearson review, found some other stuff online too. Looking much more rounded now, so I'm going to pass this one. Well done. GRAPPLE   X  18:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)