Talk:Miley: The Movement/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 16:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Typo in the lead "six six"
 * Typo in the lead "six six"


 * "For me, the movement is something that represents, like, taking over the world."[8]" not verbatim from the source
 * Cyrus says this piece in the video attached, should I find a reference that says that quote in text?


 * "Footage" is mentioned in the article but the reference only mentions "pictures". footage is particularly cinema or film.


 * Ref for breakup with Hemsworth


 * "the track itself charted lower than expected" who expected?


 * What is a "more mixed review"?


 * "Kia Makarechi from The Huffington Post was critical of the decision to avoid mentioning Hemsworth and toning-down of the criticism she received after the MTV Video Music Awards" "she" refers to: 1) Hemsworth, 2) Makarechi, or 3) Cyrus? I suppose the third…


 * "years' past." years past?


 * "In its original broadcast in the United States on October 2, 2013, Miley: The Movement was watched by approximately 1.6 million viewers; in doing so, it earned a 0.8 rating in the 18–49 demographic." awkward wording, "in doing so" is used, although nothing was "done". could you rephrase?


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Sources are reliable, inline citations are present in the correct places.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * "Broad in its coverage" could be better met by providing details of the extra 30 minutes of footage, beyond the bare bones of "it was broadcast".


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article is reasonably neutral with positive and negative reviews detailed.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable; no edits in the last 12 days.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two images are used, one appropriately licensed through flickr; the other, non-free, image has a valid FUR. Captions are suitable and demonstrate the images' relevance to the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Close to a pass, so I am not going to put this on hold. C679 17:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Aside from that one note above that I have a question on, I believe I've answered all of your comments. Thanks so much for your time, I appreciate it! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The discrepancy was, I believe, just a matter of using "the" instead of "a". Should be straightforward to address. C679 17:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah I see what you mean, I've taken care of that portion! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The criteria is now met, passing article, closing review. C679 19:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! WikiRedactor (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)