Talk:Military–entertainment complex

The Word "Co-Scripted"
This article states that the films in the list were "co-scripted" by the US military, but I don't believe that's accurate. The source for that section is a list of films that were given assistance by the military, but that's wildly different than saying that the military had a hand in actually writing them. From my understanding, the military does get access to read the scripts of the films before agreeing to cooperate and allow the usage of military vehicles and logos, but outside of a few rare instances, I don't believe that they actually take part in writing or editing the scripts of these films. Unless someone has a source showing that they actually made changes to the scripts of the listed films, this phrasing should be changed to note that the films received military cooperation rather than calling them "co-scripted." Offensivename (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It's been over a year and no one responded, so I changed it. I believe that the phrase I used is more accurate than "co-scripted." Offensivename (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Internet media?
After seeing another wave of US military weapons in the recommendations of youtube I now think this article is horribly outdated. 217.120.14.63 (talk) 11:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

"Military-gaming complex" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Military-gaming complex. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Redundant info - quote
There is an interesting (but lengthy) quote by film director Elmer Davis which is listed in both the 'History' and 'Movies' section of this page. It could be cut from one of them, to avoid redundancy. Richard Move (talk) 09:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)