Talk:MilitaryWeek.com

I have again corrected your revision. Your comma behind the quotation mark is grammatically incorrect as is your use of the semicolon. But don't take my word for it. Look it up in any book of English grammar.


 * Check Manual of style. You're taking your own custom to be standard; I assure you that it isn't, and in this case your structures on commas go against Wikipedia style.
 * Please sign your messages. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 08:46, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Very well. It still looks odd to me, but who am I to argue with Wikipedia's Style manual. Thanks for at least knowing what you are doing. So many people in today's world don't, but will defy and argue their incorrect point all the same. I have no Wikipedia name to sign, so let's just say X-weaver3.

Billed as
I have reverted it back to "billed as" instead of "billing itself as." The latter is not accurate and is less concise. If you look on the site you will see that a newspaper or magazine has made the claim. MilitaryWeek is billed as... it does not bill itself. Thank you.


 * I have looked at the site, adn can see no mention of this phrase at all. I've therefore deleted it altogether (it was in any case unsuitable for an encyclop&aelig;dia article). Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 21:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)