Talk:Military history of Australia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've skim read through this article and it looks like a possible WP:FAC. However, I will only be assessing it against WP:WIAGA. As it's a comprehensive article it could take up to a week to review, but I will try to make it shorter than that. I will be reviewing section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries. I appreciate your time and look forward to your comments. Anotherclown (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * It's quite an easy article to read. I've got as far as the Second Boer War, I've not checked the citations, but no problems to report so far. Pyrotec (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. This article appears to be a possible WP:FAC; can I suggest that it is subjected to WP:PR as a first step? Pyrotec (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for your time with this and for your comments Pyrotec. I have a couple of things I want to do with the article and will then look at a PR, and possibly FAC. Cheers.Anotherclown (talk) 03:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)