Talk:Millbourne, Pennsylvania/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Review coming soon. Steelkamp (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to quickfail this review. There are several problems:
 * This is a long way from meeting the good article criteria for being well written and broad in its coverage.
 * There are several instances of close paraphrasing, as shown by this tool.
 * The tag at the top of the article is definitely still valid.
 * The issues stated in the previous two reviews have not been fixed.

Here are some things you should do before renominating this article again.
 * The article could do with a major rewrite. This would help with GA criterion 1 and with the close paraphrasing issue.
 * Expansion is needed for the history section. Why is there hardly any history from 1909 to the present?
 * Unit conversions should be added for the temperatures.
 * There are some paragraphs which should have sources added.
 * What's a shared car "node"?
 * If the borough had a fire department until 2019, then who provides that service now?
 * There's no detail on state or federal politics. What state and federal electoral district is Millbourne in?
 * What is a borough? Is there a page that can be linked to that explains that?
 * Courts and schools are only mentioned in the lead. Education in particular could do with its own section.
 * There's honestly too many images.
 * Look at what the other reviewers before me have said. They make good points.

I suggest you don't nominate this article again until at least the above things are fixed. Steelkamp (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)


 * @Steelkamp, from my understanding, the issues that still remain from the other reviewers include MOS issues, referencing issues, and broad coverage. Is this correct? PersonKnows (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Steelkamp (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)