Talk:Mille Marković

Removed all references to Club Privé
We had reported he owned "Club Privé" as reported by other media as well plus a photo of the club. But apparently the owner of Club Privé is the ex-hockey star Michael Badelt. See: http://www.magasinetparagraf.se/portratt/menace-to-society http://www.dn.se/sthlm/forlangde-inte-avtal-med-porrklubb-stamdes-pa-100-miljoner/ and many other sources. Although Mille and Michael were acquainted, a long legal dispute arose when Mille Markovic claimed ownership and a legal dispute ensued without him proving any ownership. Using photo of a club not involved in this case is not merited. werldwayd (talk) 23:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's more complex than that. This article tells that there was a court ruling where it was found that Marković isn't the owner to the club and that Michael Badelt is the sole owner. It says that Marković isn't allowed to operate any businesses in Sweden (see e.g. sv:Näringsförbud or for an explanation of what this means). Because of this, he couldn't operate Club Privé himself (at least not officially), and it says that he has therefore operated the strip club unofficially through other people, Michael Badelt being one of them. This page suggests that Marković was the initial owner of the club.
 * This article mentions a different business which he might have been operating through other people. Someone opened a so-called "beauty parlour" (sic!), Club Harem. It says that Marković's former wife owns 50% of Club Harem according to a recent legal document, and there is currently a legal dispute because the landlord doesn't think that it is legal to operate a strip club between 10 PM and 7 AM if you have signed a contract where it says that you are allowed to operate a beauty parlour between "ten and seven" (unspecified if AM or PM). --Stefan2 (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This is becoming more and more intriguing. Harem should be mentioned I think as a Markovic business. Of course the May 10, 2013 incident in front of Club Privé as incited by Markovic to get even is already mentioned as well. werldwayd (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Have you seen this about Club Privé? There has been a legal procedure where the landlord wanted the club to move, and the Supreme Court decided not to hear the case. The club therefore has to move, as decided by Svea hovrätt. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)