Talk:Milton Blockhouse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this one, probably over the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Toolbox check
 * Two dabs: pike and porter.
 * No EL issues reported.

Prose/content/structure
 * Let me know if my copyedit changed any meaning.
 * I notice "Device plan" links to Device Forts, which is fine, just want to check if "plan" should be capitalised.
 * Level of detail seems fine for this subject -- poor old fort didn't have much of a career, did it?!

Referencing
 * Fully cited and sources look reliable.
 * Formatting generally seems fine although I think you're using hyphens for page ranges and I believe MOS still favours short dashes.

Images
 * Appropriately licensed/captions.
 * File:Gravesend defences 1588 Thamesis Descriptio.png doesn't have alt text, although admittedly it's not a requirement.

Look forward to seeing you apply your talents to more articles on Henry's device forts, especially Deal! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Changes should be done now; I think that Device plan is probably OK... Deal is definitely on the list! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey the same can be said for the whole series of Device Fort articles! Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  11:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)