Talk:Mimana

POV comments reverted
Anon's pro-Japanese and newbie's pro-Korean unreferenced comments were reverted. Still, they may be useful for someone who can provide sources:. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * More unsourced POV reverted: . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Removal of content
Hi, I disagree with this edit of yours (earlier as an IP ). I think you are removing content that is relevant and topical, and moving it to an article which users interested in the meaning of "Mimana" are not likely to read at first. Please explain to me how it makes any sense. Also—but not less important—you have completely broken the references section with your removal, leaving one reference undefined, and several defined references unused, as you can clearly see here. In the future, please do not introduce technical problems in pages that are working. JBchrch (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, this is, I apologize for creating technical problems in the article. I do not think that it is a serious problem since Wikipedia has bots that fix articles though. Anyway, as I am interested in ancient East Asian history, I can confidently claim that the article [{Mimana]] and Relations between Kaya and ancient Japan is very related; Mimana is a Japanese name of ancient Korean confederate states of Kaya. I just wanted to keep a short summary on Mimana while moving main sources and contents to the main article, Relations between Kaya and ancient Japan. I also believe that Relations between Kaya and ancient Japan is a more straightforward article title for most English speakers; Kaya is an English academic name for the ancient Korean confederate instead of the Japanese name Mimana. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npovobsessed (talk • contribs) 13:02, March 28, 2021 (UTC)


 * , I am leaning to suggesitng a merge from the Relations between Gaya and ancient Japan to here. Shorter title is better and yes, the topics overlap. Btw, It's Gaya not Kaya - not that I feel strongly about this (but if you want you can start a WP:RM for moving Gaya confederacy to Kaya confederacy).  --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Sounds great. Anyone agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npovobsessed (talk • contribs) 06:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sound good to me 👍 JBchrch (talk) 11:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)