Talk:Mimic (film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mimic.jpg
Image:Mimic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Trivia
Just because its (grudgingly) accepted doesn't mean that Trivia doesn't require sources, nor can it be felt with non relevent information, such as the personal life of a member of the crew, or his friends who might be mutual friends with other members of the crew. Also, I don't believe its relevent that it was set in Manhattan but not shot there, that happens all the time, infact from commentaries I gather that its almost impossible to actually shoot in Manhattan, its much easier to shoot in LA, Toronto or wherever. Uses of these locations is also not a surprise, lots of movies are shot in LA and Toronto. So leave those 2 things out and get sources if you add back the other "valued information". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Summary
Seriously? Is Wikipedia some kind of cheap advertisement nowadays? Why are there so much incomplete summaries, like this one? If I look up movies at Wiki, I want to know what happens to spare me the possible waste of time, not to read a cheap teaser-summary that ends on "the must save the world!" or something -.- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.77.254.167 (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)