Talk:Mimosa (cocktail)

Naming
I wonder how the cocktail got the name "mimosa"?
 * Because of the color of the leave of mimosa: genus of leguminous shrubs, 1731, coined in Mod.L. (1619) from L. mimus "mime" + -osa, adj. suffix (fem. of -osus); so called because some species (including the common Sensitive Plant) fold leaves when touched, seeming to mimic animal behavior. The alcoholic drink is so called from its yellowish color, which resembles that of the mimosa.  Iola k ana • T  15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Needs Work
This page needs some work.Sirlearnsalot 9 December 2006


 * Agreed. I just tagged it  . Hopefully that will encourage someone to do just that very thing. :-) --Willscrlt 13:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Shaken?
The infobox says it should be served "shaken"... why? you shouldn't shake it!

Measurements...
In the description text it says that it consists of three parts champagne to two parts orange juice, however in the sidebar it lists the amounts as one part each. This needs to be fixed to one or the other.

Thetruereddragon4 23:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Copied material
The second and third paragraphs of the lead are basically copied and pasted from the footnote following the first paragraph. I assume this is considered bad form on Wikipedia and should be fixed ASAP. Is there a tag one can use to mark copyvios? Huw Powell (talk) 00:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for getting that fixed! Huw Powell (talk) 02:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Neat, or straight up?
The infobox here says the drink is served neat, but the Bartending terminology page says that neat means "a single, unmixed liquor served without being chilled and without any water, ice, or other mixer." The mimosa is a mixed drink, and is served chilled, both of which seem to contradict the idea that it is served neat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:150:C100:590:CD1E:2352:EE84:DDD7 (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse
— Assignment last updated by Mlclark1 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Re: Mixing ratio

 * The mixing ratio varies

Am I strange in thinking this is unusual? I've always thought there's an average mixing ratio that everyone can agree upon. Does it vary in this instance due to other factors? Viriditas (talk) 08:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)