Talk:Mini dental implant

Are there any specific passages that are thought to not contain a neutral point of view? Dailey78 (talk) 21:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)dailey78
 * The article contains factual errors (implants are constructed of CP titanium) and you are . Mini dental implants are insufficiently distinct from regular dental implants -- either by conception, construction, surgical technique, instrumentation, patient management or post-operative care -- to deserve an article unto themselves.  Rather, a blip about them on the regular dental implant article is more appropriate, and a less overt marketing approach ought to be taken when mentioning a brand name (and certainly not upwards of 3 times in the article!)   DRosenbach  ( Talk 12:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your commentary. I did not add the CP titanium statement. Thanks for alerting the world that it should be improved. There are several companies listed on the Dental implant page (both in picture captions and in the text). Will you be improving the Dental implant article by removing the branding from the picture captions and article text? It appears that the Dental implant article could be improved, as well.

Repeated personal attacks lead to the dispute resolution process.

Dailey78 (talk) 03:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)dailey78

Are there any specific passages that are thought to not contain a neutral point of view? This doesn't seem to be generating much discussion. Maybe the tag is unwarranted. 96.41.81.174 (talk) 17:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)dailey78