Talk:Minibeast

including, but not limited to
"Including, but not limited to" is lawyer-speak and is unnecessary since "including" implies additional items already. --Unimath (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed, and the 'many more' at the end cinches it. Arlo James Barnes 09:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Marketing BS. Delete?
this belongs to Wiktionary. not every word is a lemma. --92.224.153.80 (talk) 92.224.153.80 (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)