Talk:Minimum Foundation Program/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Guerillero &#124; My Talk  03:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Since no one has jumped on this yet I will do the review. --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  03:37, 30 April 2011 (U

The bot says that this article has been on hold for 20 days now, and there appears to have been no activity on the review page for a week. It looks like nearly everything has been ticked off the list. While WP:There is no deadline, I'd like to have this wrapped up before long, if that's reasonably possible. If you need help, please let me know. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There is a sourcing issue. Two PDFs are used as the backbone sourcing of the article. The issue is that page number aren't used; most citation style require this. After that happens I will pass this --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  19:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Technically, the Good article criteria do not require complete/consistent/ideal citations, so I don't think that I would fail an article over a failure to provide page numbers (assuming, importantly, that the absence of page numbers didn't prevent me from figuring out whether the content was actually in the source). But I agree that it would be preferable to have the page numbers included for any book or pdf that's more than a few pages long, so I hope that someone will add them.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * per the above discussion I will pass this. Since the nominator appears to not be active I will roll up my sleeves and do some work. --Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  02:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)