Talk:Ministry of Finance (Soviet Union)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk)  11:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Generally looks pretty good, but I am placing the article on hold until the above is fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  11:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * ✅ Instead of being a see also link, mention of the Narkomfin Building should be incorporated into the text.
 * ✅ Do you write American or British English? Try to be consistent.
 * Can you give any examples? --TIAYN (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The one that struck me was 'organization' vs. 'organisation'. British uses 's', while Oxford and American use 'z'. Both appear in the article. Its not a big deal, but consistency always makes things look more professional. Arsenikk (talk)  21:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Please rewrite the "organization" section to prose and avoid all the bulleted lists. Use words to explain the meanings, and feel free to embroider.
 * ✅ Please take a look at the disambiguation links on the page.
 * ✅ Ref 12 (Ivkin) is dead.
 * (See below) Why are there page numbers in the biography section?
 * Number of pages in the book, Its been a normal procedure for some time, but i can remove it. --TIAYN (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ops, fixed it, changed it from page to pages :) --TIAYN (talk) 19:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ In the notes, Huskey is noted as 1992, but no year is mentioned in the biography section.
 * ✅ Consider adding appropriate established in and disestablished in categories.
 * Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk)  22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)