Talk:Minnesota State Capitol artwork/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Oncamera (talk · contribs) 22:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I'll will be reviewing this and leaving my recommendations/comments below.  oncamera (talk page)  22:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * I added additional details from the article to expand the lead to better summarize article.
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * I have made corrections and additions to the Minnesota State Capitol artwork page based on critiques/feedback of the other Minnesota Capitol pages I sent for review for GA status. Please let me know if there are any changes corrections or additions needed. Thank you for doing the review! Myotus (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making those changes, they really improved the article. I expanded upon the lead using details already sourced in the article.  oncamera (talk page)  01:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your time and work on this article. Your changes are appreciated and have made it a better article! Myotus (talk) 06:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)