Talk:Minnesota State Highway 36/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 01:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 20:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy to review this article!

QuickFail
If PR is not archived in 24 hours as of 20:43 22 May 2024 UTC then I will fail this article.

Source Check
Will spotcheck 13 sources. Using RNG. [11]  [3]   [19]   [24]   [8]   [17]   [1]   [22]   [12]   [5]   [6]   [20]   [14] No SPS located

Recommendations
PLEASE use cite web templates or something because basic references is kind of annoying. Note: maps are a bit hard to navigate if used as a source. But I’m not going to fail because of other road GANs.

Overall
1a. nice work! Well polished

1b.

2(a,b,c)

2d. DAYUM 0.0% PERCENT FROM EARWIG https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Minnesota+State+Highway+36&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=0&turnitin=1

3a.

3b. this is an amazing article for a road! Most roads are super short but still get GA status.

4. read through shows no signs of a biased pov

5.

6a.

6b.

Closing comments
I would recommend merging short paragraphs with eachother in order to have more clarity.@User:NotDragonius congrats on a great road article!

are you sure that this is a pass? This seems to use the old style of map citations which there is consensus are original research... For example "The portion of MN 36 south of MN 62 was redesignated as a part of MN 77 in 1980. The former highway between MN 62 and I-35W reverted to county control as CR 152 (Cedar Avenue)." isn't in the source unless one does OR and compares it to other maps. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)