Talk:Minuscule 482/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aircorn (talk · contribs) 05:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

This article contains many of the same problems as Minuscule 113, with the main issue again being the prose. The lead is better but still too short. It is not really accessible to the general reader. I am not sure whether this is a grammatical mistake or not, but it does not make sense to me The manuscript has complex context, but faded in parts. Same with Marginal apparatus is given fully and The text of the Gospels has many corrections made by two hands. It has the same issue with the short disjointed sentences and repetitive nature of the wording. The list of readings in the Text section could be presented much better if it is needed; it breaks the flow of prose considerably. I don't see the merit of having long lists in a language that the vast majority of readers will not be able to understand. Again prose is the major impediment to this article gaining good article status. AIR corn (talk) 05:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)