Talk:Mio P560

I get, that I am relatively new to the page but the article is not spreading misinformation. So It should not be deleted. Sure, this device is not "famous" for anything, but that does not mean we should not write about it. Or are there rules to which devices are "famous" enough to be written about? Also, I know, that there are rules by which articles should be written (like the WP:MOS policy), but isn't Wikipedia open to be edited by anyone in order to fix issues LIKE my poor article styling? If my article is so bad and the Mio P560 which it was about is not notable, is the Mio P550 more notable? Or is the article somehow better? Even all the sources in this article are almost all non-existent anymore.

Please just consider marking my page "needs cleaning up" or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sossak (talk • contribs)

I get your point and I fully understand it sucks to have an article you created deleted. But articles in Wikipedia require reliable and independent sources to be kept. I assume you had good faith, but rules are rules.

But no worries. I value your job and rewrote the article (if that doesn't offend you), adding good sources and better formatting. It is most likely to be kept in it's deletion entry.

I have no prejudice against you. We have all made mistakes around here, myself included. But with no mistakes, how are we supposed to learn?

Best regards, Gidev the Dood(Talk) 20:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC).