Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.


 * Thank you for your review. Tyrol5   [Talk]  00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose OK, MoS sufficiently complied with
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir
 * ✅ Added mention/ref to address this concern.


 * Thanks for sorting this out
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * OK
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * OK
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)