Talk:Mira B

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mira B. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128185605/http://www.keckobservatory.org/article.php?id=99 to http://www.keckobservatory.org/article.php?id=99

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Mira B
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Mira B's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "SIMBAD": From BD−17 63:  From Eta Ceti:  From T Ceti:  From 84 Ceti:  From Phi1 Ceti:  From Stellar classification:  From NGC 107:  From 7 Ceti: SIMBAD, AE Ceti (accessed 7 September 2012) </li> <li>From 3C 75: SIMBAD</li> <li>From NGC 352: </li> <li>From 9 Ceti: </li> <li>From Zeta Ceti: </li> <li>From Arp 147: </li> <li>From HD 4732: </li> <li>From Gamma Ceti: </li> <li>From Upsilon Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 102: </li> <li>From NGC 533: </li> <li>From SDSS J0106-1000: </li> <li>From Beta Ceti: </li> <li>From HD 10550: </li> <li>From Lambda Ceti: </li> <li>From Iota Ceti: </li> <li>From Tau Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 155: </li> <li>From Epsilon Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 171: </li> <li>From Pi Ceti: </li> <li>From CFBDS J005910.90-011401.3: </li> <li>From 63 Ceti: </li> <li>From HIP 11915: </li> <li>From Kappa2 Ceti: </li> <li>From Phi4 Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 255: </li> <li>From 1 Ceti: </li> <li>From Rho Ceti: </li> <li>From Star: </li> <li>From NGC 163: </li> <li>From Sigma Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 154: </li> <li>From NGC 165: </li> <li>From 6 Ceti: </li> <li>From HD 16152: SIMBAD, HD 16152 (accessed 3 July 2014)</li> <li>From Phi3 Ceti: </li> <li>From NGC 259: </li> <li>From HD 256: </li> <li>From Theta Ceti: </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)