Talk:Mirabilandia

Untitled

 * Someone REWROTE this article from the italian park to cover the brasilian... --89.0.10.69 (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Split

 * Would it be possible to split the subject into two articles, like it is done on the French wiki ? See : Mirabilandia (Brésil), Mirabilandia.--Jik jik (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Since there is no mention of the Italian park on this article it's not really a split, but I see what you mean. If you want to start writing an article about the Italian park I'd suggest doing so in a sandbox in your userspace (like User:Jik jik/Sandbox). Once you're done, I'll move this article to Mirabilandia (Brasil) and move your article to Mirabilandia (Italy). This page (Mirabilandia) could then serve as a disambiguation page. How does that sound? Themeparkgc   Talk  22:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh sorry. I have no ambiton to write articles on the English wiki. My English is not good enough. I just found out and resolved the confusion across the various Interwikis and found out that the French wiki is the only one, which handels both subjects (Italian and Brasilian park) in parallel. As the first complain in discussion appeared, that the article was originally describing the Italian park and was overwriten by the Brasilian one, I just wanted to give the proposal to "exhume" the original version (Italian park) from the article history and let both articles live in parallel. But I am for sure not going to do it by myself.--Jik jik (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * This article version shall be probably the best starting point for the article about the Italian park.--Jik jik (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * So far no other one did, I tried to preform the page split according to my proposal.--Jik jik (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion
On the page Talk:Mirabilandia I described the reasons why I think that it is resonable to handle the topics Mirabilandia (Brasil) and Mirabilandia (Italy) separately. If I did something wrong in sense of the standard processes (copying instead of redirect), I am sorry, and I would appreciate and help and correction. The final state accroding to my opinion shall be : --Jik jik (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Mirabilandia (Brasil) : separate page based on the version of Mirabilandia page dated 19:14, 28 April 2011
 * Mirabilandia (Italy) : separate page based on the version of Mirabilandia page dated 18:25, 20 May 2010
 * Mirabilandia : shall serve as disambiguation page
 * I have replaced the a10 speedy request with a history merge request to repair the cur&paste move. noq (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)