Talk:Mirlees

This may be an error for "Mirrlees" which is the correct spelling of the firm (as a subsidiary) cited in the article to which the reader is redirected. There is a another redirecting article with the correct spelling "Mirrlees".

There is also the author Hope Mirlees, for which a separate redirecting article now exists. Unless someone objects in the next few weeks, I'll propose deletion of the current article. Originalylem (talk) 22:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I think you'll find your deletion request rejected. This is a very obvious mis-spelling of Mirrlees and hence is eminently appropriate as a redirect (see WP:REDIR). I created both redirects some time back, on finding no article. Really, both should link to Mirrlees Blackstone (as originally created), in preparation for that existing as a future article, but WP does not allow such double-redirects, however correct they may be. -- EdJogg (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)