Talk:Mis Romances/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 9 months waiting, I'll take it Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 00:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Oh my, I believe this is the first time you've ever reviewed any of my articles for GA, no? Erick (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is the first time. © Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 03:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):
 * B. MoS compliance (included, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
 * C. No original research:
 * D. No copyright violations:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Article on hold. © Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 03:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up, I probably won't start working on this until Friday due to my busy work schedule. Erick (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I believed I've addressed most of the issues you brought up. For the length time, I used what was on AllMusic since it's the only reliable source I trust with it and the album charts template automatically makes refs 63-65 link Billboard magazine. Erick (talk) 18:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * OK then. I don't see any other issue, so I pass its nomination. Good job. © Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 01:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)