Talk:Misconception (Law & Order)

At the end of the episode, A.D.A. Paul Robinette says that the judge should have granted "the motion to set aside the verdict," while Exec. A.D.A. Benjamin Stone says that he's satisfied with the verdict "even if on a technicality." I have a hazy idea of what the motion would mean and why it can be used, but I am unclear how it applied to the details of the case presented in the episode. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thank you ahead of time! Headcrash (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Redirect target
If it is determined that this article should be merged and redirected, please redirect to an article that mentions the episode, List of Law & Order episodes (season 2), not to Law & Order. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)