Talk:Missa Salisburgensis à 53 voci

Merger proposal
I disagree that this article should be merged. This musical composition is unique and a significant work in musical history. As such it deserves a separate article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baroquesmguy (talk • contribs) 01:32, 30 September 2006

Response to above: The previous poster is mistaken: both articles under consideration describe the same musical work, and are therefore redundant. I agree with the recommended merging of Missa Salisburgensis with this article rather than vice versa (the bibliography on the other article is worth keeping; not so sure about the Blackpool Tower trivia). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.101.248.174 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 22 October 2006

Response to above: I agree with the merging of the two documents without getting rid of any of the information. The more information the better!!

I would say that it may be wise to create a combination of the two articles and publish them as Missa Salisburgensis (Biber) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.238.166.15 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 8 November 2006

Trivia

 * a fate marginally less bizarre than that which befell the original engineering drawings for Blackpool Tower which were backed by fabric and were destroyed when the fabric was made into under garments by one of the designer's relatives.

Is this strictly necessary? Someone else made a comment, so I'm crossing it out. --Vlmastra 02:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)