Talk:Missamma

Copy-editing request
Can someone help me; I am stuck on "ayurveda" ... what is it/does it mean? — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ayurveda (Science of life) is the very old medication system of native Indian subcontinent which continues till date as an alternative option. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! A link would be good. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I shall add, practising ayurvedic medicine. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Who is David, who wants to marry her. Where did he spring from into the story? — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Ramana Reddy (Telugu) / M. N. Nambiar (Tamil) as David (?) — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Anxious to save their jobs, Rao makes up a far-fetched explanation that Mary is possessed by the soul of a Christian woman, and was named after the mother of Jesus. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 12:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC) '''The plan backfires when they disturb Mary's sleep. In sleep again, she dreams of David forcing her to marry him and Rao coming to her rescue.''' Do they get caught in her room? And, they are not mentioned earlier: Doraswamy as Mr. Paul and Meenakshi as Mrs. Paul Who are they? — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 14:45, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry . I should have made it clear. The situation is, Mary has to repay a debt lent by Mr. I. P. David. A rogue basically, David pesters Mary to marry him by saying that he would forego that debt amount. Mary rejects this proposal and thus, David gives her a limited time period to repay the debt. So, she can't afford to loose the job by venting her frustration on the zamindar couple since her earnings in the form of salary is the only way she can repay his debt and get rid of him. Or else, she has to marry him. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Is he this:
 * Yes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. I shall try to slip him into the section and also give him full credit in the Cast section. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What do think of this?
 * Perfect ! Please go ahead. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Is Raju insecure because he is in love with Mary? — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 13:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No. Raju is in love with Sita. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes,I realised that after I went back to the summary ... I was returning here to write that. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 14:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Surely it is Mahalakshmi's right foot that has a mole. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 14:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. The mystery is solved in the end because of the same. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Two more ...

Raju and his assistant do not enter the room. They stand near the window and use the torch. The light keeps falling on her face and her sleep is disturbed. They run away as she believes that they are thieves. And, Mr. and Mrs. Paul are mentioned in the beginning itself here : She was found and adopted by a Christian couple, Mr. and Mrs. Paul, who named her Mary Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC) '''Seeking confirmation and, taking his assistant and a torch, he plans to make an illicit entry at night into her home. The plan backfires when they disturb Mary's sleep.''' When do you turn in? What time is it now? It is four o'clock here. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 15:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. Thanks for that.
 * The statement is good. Its 20:40 right now at my place and i shall be here till 21:30. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Id est four and a half hours difference. I've had a break. Back to the copy-editing! — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 17:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What is the "ornament"? Is it a locket or such? — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * A necklace. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Charlie Chaplin photo
In copyediting the article, I came across a photo of Charlie Chaplin which seems misplaced. According to the caption, "Chakrapani ensured that his characters were not influenced by Charlie Chaplin's style of comedy". If that's the case, why the picture of Chaplin in this article? In the source (a wiki) Chaplin is mentioned by a reviewer, not Chakrapani. Since Chaplin has nothing to do with the film or its producers, his picture in this article violates MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE and should be removed.  Mini  apolis  01:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Missamma poster.jpg

Question about Factual information
Hello, Article says plot of the film is based on "the play Manmoyee Girls School by Rabindranath Maitra, and the novel Detective by Sharadindu Bandyopadhyay." based on 2 sources. But, we can not find a single novel named detective in Sharadindu Bandyopadhyay works instead there is a popular detective character Byomkesh Bakshi in many of his works which might be the reason for confusion. I would like to bring this to attention of users like who improved this page and  who generally contributes to Indian literature related pages. --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 16 October 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not Moved For All - Whilst the !votes were roughly even, the arguments made against moving all were better founded in policy/guidelines, particularly WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, with evidence cited to support that view. Consistency might also have been discussed. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC) FOARP (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC) .

– MOS:FILM asks to create disambiguation and move the title to title (year film) format. The soundtrack article would be better at new target as it would disambiguate with the year — DaxServer (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Missamma → Missamma (1955 film)
 * Missamma (soundtrack) → Missamma (1955 film soundtrack)
 * Missamma (disambiguation) → Missamma
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Support: But keep Missamma (soundtrack) as it is since the 2003 film does not have a soundtrack article. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  04:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Support moving the film article but disambiguating the soundtrack feels unnecessary as stated above. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose moving the soundtrack article, per WP:ALBUMDAB and Oppose moving the film article. There are three articles titled Missamma. The two films and the soundtrack. The 1955 film is significantly more notable, in much better condition and receives considerably more pageviews than the 2003 film. Tree Critter (talk) 09:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Tree Critter. |Missamma_(2003_film)|Missamma_(soundtrack) Page views show the 1955 film is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC so no change is necessary.  See also Google results.  WP:PRIMARYFILM applies; to the extent that MOS:FILM contradicts WP:NCF, the latter should take precedence as a naming convention (to which MOS:FILM cross refers). Havelock Jones (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)