Talk:Missing letter effect

Article Evaluation
After doing a semi-thorough evaluation of this article I believe that there are a few things that need to be improved.

1. The hypotheses section should be broken down into the different hypotheses that exist for the missing letter effect. It would make it more obvious to the reader what hypotheses are out there.

2. Visual aids should be added. Especially for a topic that is very visually focused, I believe it is important to add those visual aids to show the missing letter effect. It is a lot easier to show than describe.

3.Newer research should be added. All of the journals cited except for one come from before 2004 I believe. Newer research should be represented in this article in order to get the best information out there.

Zyskes (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)