Talk:Mississippi Highway 24/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

I will review this article after the Super Bowl. – TC N7  JM  23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Starting review now, also going to add a KML. – TC N7  JM  22:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Lead/Infobox
 * The lead states that the route is 76.3 miles long, but the infobox says 76.0. Which is correct?
 * Fixed.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Route description
 * Subject-verb agreement issues in the first sentence of the second paragraph.
 * Fixed.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm seeing a lot of inconsistency in verbs used after subjects that include multiple highways such as "MS 24/MS 33." Either use a plural verb throughout the entire article or a singular one.
 * Made consistent.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I wasn't going to comment on this, but it's bugging me more and more as I read the article. Similar to the PA Tpk. ACR, you have a lot of [verb]ing uses after commas that can easily be changed. History, too.
 * Changed.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

History
 * Is it possible to split the first paragraph in two to get rid of the large block of text?
 * Split.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Major intersections
 * You use concurrency throughout the article, but overlap in this section. You should only use one.
 * Changed.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Final verdict
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose is a bit off.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images, so it doesn't really matter
 * 1) Overall: Just a few issues here. – TC N7  JM  04:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I'm passing the article. Good job! – TC N7  JM  04:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: Just a few issues here. – TC N7  JM  04:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments.  Dough 48  72  04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I'm passing the article. Good job! – TC N7  JM  04:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)