Talk:Mississippi Highway 350/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * The last two sentences of the intro both start with the route; the first part of the route description is fact after fact, it didn't really feel like a story. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Changed the word, and the first part of the route description can't really be moved to other parts of the article.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Maybe there's something to be said about the Tishomingo County Game Refuge? TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Other than being in the same county, there's no relation with the route.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Doesn't it pass through it? Google might be lying to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Google lied to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Why isn't it included as a part in the NHS? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * USDOT usually doesn't say why a route is not in the system.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * It seems well written again, if the points I addressed are (if they should be) fixed, it may be passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Passed.TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * It seems well written again, if the points I addressed are (if they should be) fixed, it may be passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Passed.TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems well written again, if the points I addressed are (if they should be) fixed, it may be passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Passed.TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)