Talk:Mississippi Highway 602/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Good summary. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * Hancock County, Mississippi, Pearl River County, Mississippi and John C. Stennis Space Center are all three linked two times; the two counties are also linked in the infobox and the major intersections sections. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Removed a link for the space center. The other two are okay, AFAIK.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 00:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Used reliable logs with an additional map. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Why was the route removed from the state highway system? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Can't find sources for that...can't really interpret more than what's on the map.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 17:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * No photographs are present. (photographs of still standing route markers, old photographs if available?) TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictures of roads in Mississippi (that are useable) are extremely rare...and there aren't any for this one.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Usually they're not required at GA, though we do encourage nominators to try and find some if possible. --Rschen7754 04:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Usually they're not required at GA, though we do encourage nominators to try and find some if possible. --Rschen7754 04:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

This is my first ever review, of course it will need additional reviewers, but I want to learn this stuff, so I thought, let's try it. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All issues resolved.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, then it looks like a Good Article to me. It probably needs another reviewer though, since this was my first review. TheWombatGuru (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems fine for GA, though it wouldn't progress any further. --Rschen7754 20:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)