Talk:Mississippi Highway 604/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will place the article on hold for a few concerns to be addressed.  Dough 48  72  01:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the route description, I would switch the order of the paragraphs to have the description of the route progession to be first and the traffic count/NHS/code/scenic byway paragraph be second.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There is Mississippi road map for which the maps can be templaticized with.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * In the route description, you should mention how many lanes the route is and whether it is divided or not.
 * Any road names for MS 604?
 * What kind of "buffer zone" is near Pearlington?
 * When was this road originally built and when was it initially designated as US 90?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

All issues fixed except the references and road name, since there isn't one.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 17:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You still don't provide a date of when the road was initially built and designated as US 90.  Dough 48  72  21:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * With that issue addressed, and some factual fixes I applied myself, I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  03:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)