Talk:Mississippi Highway 9W/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * will review. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * review
 * "The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce, Calhoun County north to MS 7 south of Oxford, Lafayette County." - this is hard to read. Are some commas or semicolons needed?
 * Fixed.  Dough 48  72  00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "designated onto its current alignment in 1956" - is that the way it's said? or should it be just "to its current alignment"? or some other wording?
 * Reworded.  Dough 48  72  00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I've made one edit which you are free to revert.
 * on hold for now. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments.  Dough 48  72  00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * reply
 * "Mississippi Highway 9W (MS 9W) is a state highway located in northern Mississippi. The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce in Calhoun County and heads north to MS 7 south of Oxford in Lafayette County."
 * Do you mean MS 9 starts north of Bruce in Calhoun County and then heads north to MS 7 which is south of Oxford in Lafayette County?
 * Do you mean that MS 7 is south of Oxford in Lafayette County? Or do you man that MS 7 heads north to MS 7, then south of Oxford in Lafayette?
 * Sorry for being confusing. MathewTownsend (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Reworded to clearly indicate where southern and northern termini are.  Dough 48  72  16:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * ok, it's clearer. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Thanks for clarifying! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
 * b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
 * b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * c. no original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * no edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * no edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass