Talk:Missouri Route 162/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Any info on when the diamond interchange at I-55 was built? And any cost there?
 * Cost added.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 06:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * "and its section from Clarkton to Gideon was paved one year later." -- Any cost on this?
 * As with Route 164, I can't immediately tell if the first sentence in the route description is a traffic count for this route. Is it, and if not can that number be found?
 * Fixed.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 06:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Finally, perhaps would be good to include if there are any landmarks or notable businesses on this one, or if it's an all residential road. I get it's a rural place but the information seems a bit basic as is now.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass Sources are largely maps, but not spotting any holes in citing. —Ed!(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * No images here, technically possible but not feasible unless we had someone on WP living nearby, which isn't likely. Any chance for a map?
 * 1) Other:
 * Dup links, dab links, external links and copyvio tools all showing no problems.
 * Source spotcheck Ref 7 and Ref 14 are appropriately referenced to the content in the article.

On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Good work on this one! Passing for GA. —Ed!(talk) 20:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)