Talk:Missouri v. Holland

Bricker Amendment
For some time I have been working on revisions to the Bricker Amendment article. I finally posted it and have a PR at Peer review/Bricker Amendment/archive1. I'd welcome comments. I know all those references may seem extravagant, but I'm hoping to get it as an FA and those voters want lots of footnotes. PedanticallySpeaking 16:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Very confusing opening line.
The line -- the first line in both the introductory part and the holding part of this article -- that describes what this case was about, is terrible, and very confusing. The point is that the state does not have power to nullify a US treaty. It's not that hard to explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanHakimi (talk • contribs) 23:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Missouri v. Holland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827182413/http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/118/April05/RosenkranzFTX.pdf to http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/118/April05/RosenkranzFTX.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)