Talk:Misty Mundae

There seems to be a lot of heretofore unknown people randomly adding images (badly-formatted images at that, forcing me to resize and reposition them), text, etc. to this article with very little forethought, or at least that's how it seems. You all should really put more effort into making this article more encylcopedic, including admitting the fact that for a time, yes, Misty was in fact a softcore pornography star-- in effect, the productions made by E.I. Cinema were softcore porn humor/spoof films, nothing more, nothing less. To downplay that aspect of her past is as bad as overemphasizing it. The point of an encyclopedia should be balance, especially when it comes to Wikipedia.


 * I agree. The films ARE softcore pornography. The erotica entry itself defines it erotica as "material with a higher emotional content" which the E.I. films do not really have. They are commercially produced films that features sex scenes that are not explicit. Erotica tends to be a bit more artsy. User:JohnBWatt

What is her actual name?

i don't agree
Of course most of EIs films were softcore humor/spoof films but there were quite a few of them that were very emotional and much more serious...putting them into more of an erotic category. These include Lustful Addiction, Roxanna, The Seduction of Misty Mundae, and Lust for Dracula. So some of the films by EI Cinema that Misty starred in should be labeled erotica. BTW it's pretty cool to know that JohnBWatt was actually the lucky scarecrow that got a big hug from Misty at the end of Playmate of the Apes! ;)  71.199.83.7


 * Well, as you probably see, I rewrote the entry to include both types of films, as we were both right to an extent. And yes, I am the same JohnBWatt from Playmate of the Apes. If you're into trivia on the film, I also played a few other background parts. I'm one of the apes chasing the girls through the woods and I'm also the ape guard, dressed in all black, during the first stripper scene. JohnBWatt

Editing
Besides correcting some grammar, I switched the second and third paragraph because it went from an introduction paragraph to a timeline to a continuation of the introduction and back to a timeline. 71.255.201.56, as popular as she may be, within the softcore and horror community, she is NOT a superstar or household name yet. JohnBWatt

Starting the one paragraph off with "It is still for her roles..." sounds bad. Saying that makes it sound as if the article has already established other aspects of her life or career, which it hasn't. User:JohnBWatt

i don't agree
I think the paragraph reads better when arranged with "It is still" at the beginning. It puts the fact that she is most widely known for these films at the forefront and lists the films in the middle, rather than being a muddled sentence with ten thousand elements. 71.246.72.168 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The way I'm writing it also states that she is most widely known for these films without making it sound like a comparison. We're essentially saying the same thing but you're using words that compare without something to compare it too. If you were listing the horror films she worked on, first, and THEN wrote "It is still...." it would make sense. Doing it that way would throw the chronological aspect off though. JohnBWatt

Additional Pictures
I've moved the three pictures that were stacked haphazardly beneath the one that is currently in the infobox, mainly because it made it look too crowded. Their placement into the article itself could obviously use some work even from where I've moved them but at least the infobox doesn't look so odd with them beneath the other picture now. 75.2.52.75 19:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Weasel Words and Merge
This article needs to be merged into Erin Brown as the two articles refer to the same person, and the content is nearly identical. Also this article contains weasel words, especially in the text talking about her change in movie genre. For discussion, see the discussion page on Talk:Erin Brown.

Autopilots 05:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)