Talk:Mitsubishi Chariot

Multiple infoboxes which repeat the same information are pointless, and create too much whitespace. Equally, one sentence sections for individual generations is deprecated by the MoS. If there's not that much to say, combine it into a single section, as it was before.

I'm also removing the infobox inamge, as it just makes the whitespace greater. That was the whole point of the gallery. --DeLarge 18:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Edit, August 15 2007
I've again removed the multiple sections, which had only a sentence or two between them. It's deprecated by the Guide to layout, which I consider a better guide to writing articles than the arbitrary habits of the Automobile WikiProject, and has the fortunate effect of removing the massive whitespaces. I've removed a lot of content from the infobox where it was duplicated in the text. This has the effect of shrinking the infobox sufficiently that there is now no overlap between it and the gallery, regardless of the screen width.

As for "this article needs expanding not reversion", I agree. Unfortunately, I can only see one line of new information in the previous edit (that the vehicle was a five door van, which is only correct terminology in a very few places). In other words, it wasn't an expansion, it was a mere layout change. I've added a lot of extra content with this edit, and cited it too, as well as adding as much production info as MMC makes available. Nevertheless, despite the expansion, it's still not nearly big enough to deserve splitting up into multiple sections. --DeLarge 20:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not say that I had expanded the article, that the article needed expanding. Your actions seem to indicate that you consider yourself the authority on Mitsubishi-related articles. I resent you throwing away work I have done on this page and disagree with your views entirely. I don't consider whitespace to be an issue. - Diceman 15:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Please comment on the automatic transmission any why it fused out of the shops and variation between the five seaters and the seven seater space wagons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.10.243 (talk) 16:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Ladder frame?
I'm not sure what Mitsubishi's "RISE" safety body is, but I am sure that the Mitsubishi Chariot has never been built on a ladder frame. This article is a friggin horrible mess. Why do Mitsubishis seem to attract so many crackpot editors? (that includes me, I suppose) Time to get to work.  ⊂ Mr.choppers ⊃  (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Engines for the final revision
Just a heads up, trawling through models sold in australia, it seems they still used a 2.4lt 4 cylinder. Now I thought maybe it was an old stockpile but they feature a dual airbag package and the same design as the final models. I'm thinking perhaps they were offered with a 2.4 as well as a 3.0 lt. If you search carsales.com.au you can see that they are available :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.203.94 (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Meaning of 'boomed' (2nd paragraph)
Currently, the second paragraph reads "This was one of the early crossover SUV models before it was boomed by the Subaru Outback's 1995 release and the Toyota RAV4's 1996 release."

I don't understand the meaning of 'boomed' in this context; no dictionary I have consulted gives any definition for the verb that makes any sense in this context. The information about the contributor who added this sentence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bull-Doser) indicates that he is a Canadian who speaks both French and English, which leads me to infer that he may be using a Canadian regionalism, or that he has borrowed a French word.

Regardless of the contributor's background, 'boomed' ought to be replaced by a Standard English term that will be generally understood. (To maximize comprehensibility, slang or dialect expressions ought to be avoided in any articles that do not explicitly make them their subject.)

I am guessing that the contributor may have intended to convey his view that the Mitsubishi Chariot was displaced in the crossover SUV market by the other two vehicle models he mentioned, but this is purely conjecture.

24.255.155.226 (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I am fairly certain that he meant that this category had yet to become popular.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  14:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mitsubishi Chariot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305232559/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061022130131/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact0009.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact0009.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305232559/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:17, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi Chariot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071101001938/http://www.tokyo-motorshow.com/eng/show/history/history_23.html to http://www.tokyo-motorshow.com/eng/show/history/history_23.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)