Talk:Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

End of development?
There seem to be some reports that Mitsubishi will end development of the Lancer Evolution series in order to concentrate on electric cars. Here is a link: http://www.dailytech.com/Mitsubishi+Kills+the+Evo+Will+Focus+on+Electric+Cars/article21040.htm. Should that be included in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.94.134.10 (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Australia
This article should note that the Evo 8 was available in limited import quantities and the Evo 9 in unrestricted quantities in Australia through selected Ralliart Dealers.

Power data for Evo X
In the article, it is said that the american version will have around 900bhp and the uk version 2000bhp. both of these numbers are ridiculous and i would really like to see them changed 89.145.39.248 (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Changed the intro a little, grammar nazi
I corrected some run-on and comma laden sentences and clarified some statements.

Performance differences around the world
After reading and ammending some of the article, it seems that a lot of the information on the Evo VIII onwards is based completely on American Evolution, yet combines some information with the Japanese Evo VIII and '05 American Evolution. I believe we should either show information for each separate country on VIII onwards or just leave it at the Japanese and Rest of World editions.


 * I've noticed something else too, the article says that the japanese editions uses the same exact same engine of the american edition and thats simply wrong, the japanese editions produce more torque, 400Nm (295 ft-lb) for the GSR and 407Nm (300 ft-lb) for the GT And RS, while the american edition produce 392 Nm (289 ft·lb, btw the japanese records can be found in the japanese official brochure and the official website here http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/EVO/performance01.html . About the MR, I've added few words last night and Im gonna add few links and performance figures today EvolutioniuM 03:05, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

(RESPONSE POSTED: 8/3/2005 -- 12:07pm EST by CGs)
 * >>"the article says the japanese editions use the same engine as the american edition and that's simply wrong"

The Japanese, American and World editions of the 2003-2005 Lancer Evolution use the 2.0Liter Mitsubishi 4G63 Turbo Engine. The lower torque in the American version has more to do with the tuning and exhaust systems used to comply with the strict American (California specifically) emission standards. Most EVO owners (including myself) have their cars retuned early on to 'fix' this. That said, the American version of the Lancer Evolution was actually based on the 5-speed Japanese Evolution VII, using exterior styling similar to the Japanese Evolution VIII.

Cornerstone of GT4?
It is also a cornerstone of the popular driving simulator Gran Turismo, with the latest version featuring over 20 variants, including racing models.

For one thing, there are only 18 versions of the Evo in GT4.

Second, 18 out of around 750 models is hardly a 'cornerstone'. That is, unless you consider the game to have 42 sides. The Skyline GTR has 32.

Third, what is this quote even doing in the Film section?--207.175.61.213 20:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Why not post info and pictures on evo x (10) concept!?
these pictures were taken from tokyo motor show 2005

http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/01.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/02.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/03.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/04.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/05.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/06.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/07.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/08.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/09.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/10.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/11.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/12.jpg http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/images/13.jpg

http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_tokyo/gallerys/mitsu_conceptx/pages/01.htm

photos courtesy of www.autoweek.com

press release from mitsubishi http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/pressrelease/e/motorshow/detail1343.html just copy all for evo x

what do you think? 195.250.215.125 20:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The biggest problem is this : © 2005. All rights reserved.. That footer means that we cannot copy these images onto Wikiperdia because they are owned by somebody else. Very cool car though --2mcmGespräch 20:41, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

yes you can use the photo freely because it's from a press release
photo was taken from a press release you can distribute it freely in non profitable way

Evo IX
Could anyone change the dated Evo 8 top picture to up-to-date Evo IX?

Just post them so people can at least see them for a week.

Lancer Evolution X Concept
Is there a need to put the picture of the concept Evo X at the bottom of the page?There's already a pic of it on top of the article...Ceecookie 11:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The Lancer Evolution X looks a lot meaner and angrier instead of a smile. Weird, yet it is the fast car and the best. Note: Help me with the Military time because I don't know how. Anything Else

Evolution V: weasel words
There is a mention of "reputable sources". Can anyone include references to those sources? --Unweasel 08:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Availability in Canada
In searching Google, I have found rumours that suggest that the X might be finally made available to Canada. Does anyone have any information regarding this? Confirm/deny? Thanks, Shawn 16:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * IT IS COMING TO CANADA>>> I SPOKE WITH A MITSUBISHI REP. ITS COMING IN 2008

capitalization of "evo"
It seems to me that in the first line, while people do refer to the Lancer Evolution as the "Evo", there's no need for it to be capitalized. It's not an acronym, and it is a short form of "Evolution", not "EVOLUTION". I'm going to change the case, although I'm not especially biased either way. It just seems more correct to use "Evo", and it reflects what many of the manufacturers (such as for aftermarket parts), as well as fan sites use. ... aa:talk 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes please do, and you're right it's not an acronym, it's just a short form. Both me and a friend of mine are getting Evo's soon, and that's what we refer to them as. ~Blake D. Hawkins 01:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Need a picture at the top?
I have a red US-market Evo VIII MR. I waxed it this weekend, so it looks halfway presentable. It's not the most recent generation, but this page lacks a decent-sized, decent quality photo for the top; do you guys want me to take a pic or are you going to hold out for an Evo IX photo? TomTheHand 21:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Needs an entire infobox, which I'm going to do right now (ignoring the individual generations). I'll use the pic of the white one, since it pretty much meets the Autoproject's photo requirements, and is an interesting pose as well -- a bit different from the usual driveway and mall car park shots. However, if you can get a better photo, knock yourself out. The only VIII we have just now is the yellow one, and that's a bit head-on and close-up to be ideal.
 * Of course, if you could capture the spirit of the car that'd be even better. How are you at four-wheel drifting at three figure speeds? Or yumping? Surely you can beat Markko Martin, after all, he's only driving a Ford Focus... --DeLarge 21:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The yellow one's a VII (2001-2002); mine is an VIII (2003-2005) as is the white one. I can't really beat the white one's pose!  All I can really offer is higher resolution and better light, and maybe I can park it on some dirt or something for the photo shoot ;-) TomTheHand 21:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Evolution vs Evo Consistency
This article constantly switches between calling the car Evolution and Evo I think one should be picked and stuck with because it is really inconsistant to switch back and forth between names. SirGrant 05:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Sportscar vs Sports saloon thing
Just to point out, luxuries does not necessarily make a sports saloon, so if the Evo is not a sports saloon then what about the Lotus Cortina and one of numerous cars that were homlogationlised for racing, as it was stated...


 * It was later applied by manufacturers to special versions of their vehicles that allowed them to enter production cars in motor races with extra modifications not normally permitted by the regulations. Such regulations required cars to be homologated typically by selling them in minimum numbers to the public.

So I hope it is possible to add the sports saloon tag to it. Also to my opinion isn't a 3 series more like a compact executive car or as defined on that page, the M3 is more like a sports saloon. Willirennen 19:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * We might be dealing with a US/British "language barrier" here or something, as here, a sports sedan is a sedan that's kinda sporty, like a BMW 3 series. See this article from Car and Driver magazine for what's considered a sports sedan over here.  "Sports car" is less definite, but I've always thought it to mean a car that is designed for performance at the expense of comfort and price.  Four doors don't automatically stop something from being a sports car. TomTheHand 12:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The Lancer Evolution is definitely a sportscar, even if an extraordinarily comfortable and versatile one. Unlike most sportscars that can be used on a trackday only and have problems even to store a cigarette pack, the Evolution has 4 comfortable seats and an emergency 5th "center" seat and a roomy trunk. This because as most rally cars it's been derived from a standard road model, but it is, nonetheless, engineered for extreme performance only, giving very little thought (if any) to comfort or luxury. Even if the M3 is comfortable and decently roomy as well, it's quite different from the Evolution. While a lot of the money you pay for an M3 goes into luxury features, almost all the cost of an Evolution has been spent in making it faster and more agile. On the RS versions, even the electric windows, stereo and AC are optional. This makes the Evolution a sportscar, and the M3 (in his standard version) a GT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.43.230.194 (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

CVT Transmission
Does the new Evo come with the CVT transmission, because this would make it more of a manumatic/automatic coupe than a manual. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zhour24 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC).


 * No, no Evo has been or will (in the near future) be available with a CVT. The current Evo is available with a 6 speed manual, a 5 speed manual, or a 5 speed automatic, depending on the market (the automatic, for example, isn't available in the US).  The next generation Evo will be available with a paddle-shifted dual clutch transmission much like Volkswagen's DSG, which is a semi-automatic transmission.  It will also be available with a 5 speed manual.  Note that while the Evo has been offered as a sedan and as a wagon, it has never been offered as a coupé. TomTheHand 14:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, yes, the Evo 7 was sold with an auto transmission and called the GTA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.139.136 (talk) 11:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Lancer and Prototype X
Did the Lancer come from the Prototype X or is it the other way around, because unlike the last generation, (EVO 9) the 'New' Lancer and the Prototype X actually looks simular --Zhour24 12:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Evo vs Evolution
I would vote for Evolution. Mitsubishi avoids Evo in all material, I gather, because Harley Davidson has the Evo name for a type of engine. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cpurrin1 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC).

URLs to images
If anyone is interested: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cpurrin1/418823886/in/set-1495012/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/cpurrin1/69478838/in/set-1495012/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/cpurrin1/436469420/in/set-1495012/


 * Thanks, but the above images have licenses which are incompatible with Wikipedia and cannot be used here. TomTheHand 15:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Replaced Evo VIII picture
Though it's cool that the Evo in the picture we were using was at a track, and a wet one at that, I never liked it much. It is low resolution and has visible artifacts, and the poor weather led to bad lighting. I have an Evo VIII, and I had wanted to take a high resolution photo and upload it, but as someone above mentioned, a high-quality picture of an Evo in someone's driveway is so much lamer than the track picture that it's not worth making the swap.

A couple of weekends ago I went to Deals Gap, North Carolina, which is an amazing drive. Several photographers set up at various points along the road and photograph all of the cars and motorcycles that go by. One photographer, Darryl Cannon of Killboy.com, got a couple of really good shots of me and agreed to release them under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license. I uploaded them to Wikimedia Commons and used one of them to replace the Evo VIII image on this page. The other is here in case anyone thinks it's a better choice or has another use for it. Hope this is ok! TomTheHand 17:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Looking at the two, I much prefer the second one. It's slightly closer to the WP traditional "front 3/4, slightly raised", so you can better see both the front end and the Bart Simpson fins on the roof. There's not a lot in it, but I think the better angle offsets the benefit of the incumbent picture, namely that it's slightly sharper. Also, I have to confess to disliking such off-horizontal shots, at least when it's to that degreee.
 * I spun/cropped shot 2 a little, and turned down the image quality which shrunk the file size by 90 percent. It's on en.WP for now (here) but it can be moved or deleted depending on the response. (It'd also need its details edited; I just copy/pasted them, so it reads like I'm the driver). The current shot might be more in focus, but it's too close to the edges to be able to be rotated much. --DeLarge 18:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I see your points. The only thing I disagree with is turning down the image quality, as it has noticeable artifacts when viewed at full resolution now.  Turning down the image quality of the 3199 × 1787 image doesn't affect viewers of this article, or even viewers of the 800 × 447 preview image, and if someone wants to view the gigantic copy they should be able to do so at full quality.  If you don't mind, I'll rotate and crop the image when I get home today and upload it to Commons at full quality; if it then looks good to you perhaps you could db-author the one you've made. TomTheHand 19:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's cool, The commonscat template at the bottom will let other people see both images anyhoo. Strangely, I don't see the mid-size preview at all when I'm logged in, no matter what browser I try (IE7, FF2, Opera 9.2). But browsing anonymously it shows up, and it pretty much solves the big file size issue. Hmmm, I'll need to get to the bottom of that. --DeLarge 20:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Check your Wikipedia Preferences, and look under the Files tab, at the Limit images on image description pages to: setting. I believe it's set to 800 × 600 by default, so most people will see a 800 × (something) preview when they look at this image, but you may have at some point set it to the maximum setting on your account.  That'd explain why you get one result when you're logged in and another when you're logged out.
 * I did a little trial rotating and found that while the second image is easy to rotate and crop, the first (sharper) image is just barely possible to crop when it's been rotated, and so I may upload both when I get home and let you have your pick. TomTheHand 20:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I prepared cropped and rotated full-quality versions of both images and uploaded them to Commons. They are Image:2005 Evo at Deal's Gap 1 cropped.jpg and Image:2005 Evo at Deal's Gap 2 cropped.jpg. The first is sharper and more tightly cropped, the second is from slightly more of an angle so that you can see more of the front and roof and it shows more of the background.

I'm replacing the image on the article with the second, because the sharpness of the first doesn't matter when it's a 250 pixel thumbnail. However, if anyone wants a pretty nice high-resolution photo of an Evo, the first image is great! TomTheHand 23:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Europe Name is Wrong!
The Evo is sold in Europe Market as Lancer Evolution, not as Carisma Evolution! Emerge.life 11:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

"Rash" deletions
User:Rps reverted my last round of deletions to restore two sections:
 * 1) "Alternative cars". WP isn't a buyers' guide, and furthermore we cannot and should not try to read the minds of readers. Alternatives to the Evo are many. Buyers may want an authentic rally-rep. But equally they may merely want a fast four-door, in which case they can think of Audi RS4s or BMW M3s. They may want a sharp-handling car, in which case everything from a Lotus Elise to a Mini Cooper are viable alternatives. They may want something Japanese. They may want something costing no more than £xxx or $xxx. Etc etc. And a 2008 Focus RS, aside from being unavailable in many of the Lancer's markets and therefore irrelevent, is, as the text indicated, entirely speculative. Just because the only alternatives you would consider are authentic rally reps doesn't mean every other buyer is the same. No original research (deciding what cars are or are not alternatives), and no speculative crystal balling.
 * 2) "In pop culture". Entirely unsourced, entirely non-notable, and flying in the face of the current purge of trivia and pop-culture articles and/or sections.

I've removed them again, You were bold, you were reverted, now discuss it, otherwise in the absence of any compelling arguments to keep them they will continue to be removed. --DeLarge 22:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Evolution 7 image
Can anyone supply a free image of an Evolution 7 that isn't heavily modified? &mdash; AKADriver &#x260E; 19:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

anyone supply some expanded text regarding this release? There where at least the following varieties I can think of RS Sprint, GSR, RSII, FQ-300, GTA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.48.204.1 (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Evolution external links
I am creating a website that let's visitors create user generated reviews and ratings of Mitsubishi Evolution products. I was curious if it would benefit the EVO page. I have also create a video compilation of all the EVO X exhausts that are currently available. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.68.102 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 24 April 2009

I was curious about adding a link to an evo x enthusiast's website that has a ton of in-depth information on the car. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kooldino (talk • contribs) 16:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * See WP:LINKS, specifically points 1, 4, and 11. Regards, --DeLarge (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't turn a profit and it is a unique information source in itself. I say it stays 24.250.185.24 (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Win

Lots of vandalism
Some bitch has fucked the page.

Can a wikimaster plez fix it? There is also a lancer evo estate available in japan only —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.142.161 (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Can't see obvious vandalism, so you'll need to be specific.
 * The wagon version is already mentioned in the article, but I also added it to the infobox as well for clarity. --DeLarge (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

FQ 400 Evo X 0-60
I think this section needs to be updated with the fastest car acceleration wiki article. It verifies the Evo X 0-60 in 3.5 sec. Here's the ref Evo X FQ 400 Acceleration 65.51.87.2 (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Production 1992–2011?
Why does infobox say "Production 1992–2011" when there are no sources in the article saying production will end in 2011? I'm chaning this to "Production 1992–present". Netrat (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Lancer Evolution X: The LAST Evo???
Is it true that Mitsubishi will stop producing Lancer Evolution? I hope it is not true because i am a fan of this car. — Preceding unsigned comment added by World Super Cars (talk • contribs) 07:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

The last few days have been rife with rumors that Evo production will cease by the end of the year. The line of Evo is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.121.136 (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Shouldn't this article contain a section for the Evolution VIII?
Shouldn't this article contain a section for the Evolution VIII? Although it contains a combination of fact and opinion, perhaps something like the text below?

NOTE: The following text came largely from www.Edmunds.com, although I have modfied/improved/rewritten/excluded many portions:

The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII had its front fascia resculpted to include Mitsubishi's new corporate style, the split-grille with prominent nose and a stronger bumper that meets the 2.5-mph impact requirement in the U.S. Inlets remain numerous so that the intercooler gets as much fresh air as possible. Standard HID headlights allow the driver to look down the road at any time of day; taillights are of the clear-lens variety. The rear spoiler is a large, aggressive rear wing. The body-hugging Recaro seats have been widened. The gas tank has been enlarged to 14 gallons.

The computer-controlled Active Center Differential with driver-selectable terrain settings didn't make it to the U.S. production car, but only the most advanced drivers are apt to find fault with the less sophisticated viscous coupling unit. Under ideal traction conditions, the front/rear torque split is 50/50, and the ratio is automatically adjusted when slippage occurs.

The U.S. Evolution VII's turbocharged 2.0-liter inline four is rated for 271 hp at 6,500 rpm and 273 at 3,500 rpm. The tachometer redline falls at 7,000, with a top-end of 9,000-rpm. The power comes on strong near the top end.

The five-speed manual transmission gearing is identical to that of the Evolution VII's, though the first and second gears have been fitted with an additional synchro each for smoother engagement and better feel during high-speed shifts, as well as greater durability.

Other hardware carried over directly from the Evolution VII to the Evolution VIII, including the large Brembo brakes (12.7-inch rotors in front, 11.8 inches in back), lightweight 17-inch Enkei wheels and specially designed Yokohama Advan A046 tires, sized 235/45WR17. Mitsubishi also include a water sprayer that automatically gives the intercooler a spritz during high operating temperatures. A competition-oriented Sports ABS system incorporates sensors that measure steering wheel angle, wheel speed and lateral and longitudinal G-forces to regulate the braking force applied to each wheel. The idea is to give the driver more control when entering a turn on a road course or his favorite twisty two-lane. Electronic Brakeforce Distribution is also included.

As noted in the www.Edmunds.com comparison test: "the steering is ultraquick; few cars on the market can match this kind of response, although it took a few laps before feeling comfortable with it; road feel through the wheel was superb, perfectly communicating how our actions in the cockpit were affecting the tires; around turns, the firm suspension (struts in the front, a multilink-modified wishbone design in the rear) did all the work, yielding flat body attitude and perfect balance when exiting turns; meanwhile, the tires offered progressive levels of howl, such that we knew well in advance when we were approaching the breakaway point."

Also noted by www.Edmunds.com: "Good as the Evo is, your confidence when driving it on a track (or a public road) has much to do with your own skill. Less experienced drivers who buy this car should strongly consider a performance driving course in order to get the most fun possible out of their purchase."

 KCKralick KCKralick (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Be bold, add a VIII section. But don't plagarise (copy from) another website to do so. Any copied text from another site will be removed sharpish. --Falcadore (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

EVO X Image
Is there not a press or manufacturer photo available for the EVO X? The modified example is inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.138.102 (talk) 03:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

6th and 7th generation pics should be remove
The 6th and 7th are not stock models. They are modified and are incorrect. Thanks, Marasama (talk) 04:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100419120356/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.ca:80/Lancer_Evolution/Awards.aspx to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.ca/Lancer_Evolution/Awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160122113032/http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/print.php?sid=1098 to http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/print.php?sid=1098

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929120459/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/about_us/technology/review/e/pdf/2001/13E_09.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/about_us/technology/review/e/pdf/2001/13E_09.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.naias.com/SubPage.aspx?id=506
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305232559/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322203749/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/about_us/technology/review/e/pdf/2006/18e_25.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/about_us/technology/review/e/pdf/2006/18e_25.pdf
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67TVIsUxY?url=http://www.carpages.ca/blog/ to http://www.carpages.ca/go/conceptcars/2007_mitsubishi_prototype_x_concept.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020152213/http://lancerevolution.ca/archive/35/mitsubishi-announces-competitive-pricing-for-long-awaited-lancer-evolution/ to http://lancerevolution.ca/archive/35/mitsubishi-announces-competitive-pricing-for-long-awaited-lancer-evolution/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091209011145/http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/4230193.html to http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/4230193.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007000900/http://www.4wheelsnews.com/tag/mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-dave-tv-award/ to http://www.4wheelsnews.com/tag/mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-dave-tv-award/
 * Added tag to http://www.lancer-evolution.eu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Change Lancer EVO X Final Edition image
The current image only shows a Final Edition with aftermarket parts. I recommend changing the picture to show a stock Final Edition for better reference. (I would put the image down below, but my internet was too poor) Sagquattro2009 (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)