Talk:Model–view–adapter

Delete
There doesn't seem to be anything known about this architecture beyond the original author's understanding. A quick Google search indicates that this pattern's usage starts and ends with Bungee Connect. Candidate for deletion? --87.198.21.132 (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, delete it. Unless the original creator wants to expand on it, and provide some reference to an author who writes about it or uses it.  There's too many variations of the MVC pattern to have some unknown one lying around.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.52 (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Apparently you are unaware of Sun's very educational article on this topic. Sun's article now forms the basis of this article. —optikos (talk) 03:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It would make sense to delete it. The basis of this architecture as described is that it entirely separates Model from View while claiming that MVC does not. And yet the first image at the top of Model–view–controller shows that in fact MVC (as commonly understood) does exactly this. So if it's not going to be deleted it needs a rewrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.192.122 (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)