Talk:Modeling and analysis of financial markets

As I've indicated on the financial modeling page, which I've just read, perhaps the separation is warranted. Perhaps this page better described as simply Analysis of financial markets, which should be a sub-set of financial analysis page I would think. Of course topics are intimately tied together, but not sure purpose here looks to have much to do with modeling itself, pretty high level stuff. Just a thought -- happy to be shot down by whomever feels they want to look again at this page. FASTModeler (talk) 00:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The problem is that this article seems a bit too broad and general. Any content it has is better suited to subsections of other articles. I'll do some merges later if no one complains.--Fangz (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you mean by "do some merges". I think this article should continue to exist.Eric Kvaalen (talk) 13:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

These are definitely two different entries: modeling the markets and financial modeling. However, the financial modeling page needs some editing, as it stands right now it is confusing and I understand why the issue of merging has been raised. Definitely do NOT merge. I will edit the financial modeling entry Zenioss (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

The "Financial modelling" article is very lightweight and insufficient for a stand-alone article. It might serve as an introduction to the other article, though. Ehrenkater (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)