Talk:Modern antipope

Old discussion
For a lot of old discussion on the subject, the pre-split talk page of Antipope, see Talk:Antipope. --Pjacobi 18:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Sedevacationism and the papal veto
The veto was used on a number of cases - the last involved being Mariano Cardinal Rampolla and Pius X - have any sedevacationist claims arisen thereby? Jackiespeel 18:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Superfluity and non-encyclopedic nature
Sedevacantist antipope is a contradiction and does not exist. To be a sedevacantist one must deny that there is a pope. The article, to be encyclopedic, should be renamed conclavist popes and include a link to Benedict XVI (!). There can be a re-direct from conclavist antipopes and an explanation of why such a phrase is as nonsensical as atheist theist. pauldanon


 * See my comments on the Antipope talk page - which relate to that article before it was rearranged to the present format. Jackiespeel 22:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that the title is bad, for the additional reason that the Collinites are listed that are not even "ultradionalists", let alone "sedevacantist". How about "modern antipopes, "minor antipopes" or the like. Str1977 (smile back) 12:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)