Talk:Modernist Christianity

The original article described the term as perjorative. The historical context of modernism was seen as a positive at the time; a response to orthodoxy in light of 'new' discoveries. Though the term may be used perjoratively in today's battle of words between liberal and orthodox viewpoints, the historical significance is more neutral.

The schools of thought may not be in agreement, but the basic understanding of points of view can be described without bias. The views are what they are. It is not the intention of the article to prove right and wrong.

Robbie Giles 03:51, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)

Categories
I'm don't quite see how Christian fundamentalism relates to Modernist Christianity. Can someone explain the addition of that category to this article? --Randolph 16:27, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * No replies to my question so I have removed that category. --Randolph 18:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think this article needs to draw a distinction between modernism and liberalism. There is a common term used in Catholic circles in which certain practices are labelled as modernism. The term liberal christianity really deserves an article of it's own. It's quite common to label liberal christianity as progressive christianity these days too. --Randolph 18:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Merge?
Should we merge this article with Liberal Christianity? KHM03 22:45, 28 September 2005 (UTC)