Talk:Moga (mascot)

All-caps
"However it is stylization, see articles like One Piece (2023 TV series). Or are mascot articles treated differently?" That one article does not establish some kind of editorial standard, and it's certainly not a GA or FA. I'm not going to edit war over this, but it seems to me that a. it's trivial and b. it's another aspect of this article's excessive content. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * If this is regarding the article, I don't think this is an appropriate space to talk over it. I'll be moving this discussion to the article's talkpage. Rejoy2003(talk) 17:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It is regarding the article and its main editor. Drmies (talk) 19:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You do know for a fact right that not all people are available on Wikipedia all the time? Anyways why only this article has this removed? I suppose articles like One Piece or even Juice Wrld should be removed? Or is it some bias regarding Indian articles or articles that "less people are interested in" ?Rejoy2003(talk) 13:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You know, User:Rejoy2003, while you have displayed considerable anger and are now engaging in personal attacks (of bias, somehow), you still haven't given an argument except for "LOOK AT THAT ARTICLE". But I can do that too: look at Ajax (cleaning product). The logo is even there. Why haven't you added that note to that article? Are you biased against American-invented products using Alkylbenzene sulfonate? Anyway, this is getting too stupid. You don't have an argument, all you have are attacks on my integrity. I'm going to put a harassment tag on your talk page and you can keep your "stylized as all-caps". Drmies (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)