Talk:Mohamed Ashmalee

WP:BLP sourcing
This WP:BLP requires more and better reliable sources to support even non-contentious content. Recent edit history of reversions, escalation to WP:BLPN, and protection with zero talk page input all signify there are probably more productive ways to set about a correction. I support User:ToBeFree's edits as removal of cruft verbatim. And think this is the best place to explain views to the contrary. WP:BLPN is for when having done so doesn't result in a WP:CONSENSUS. Proponents of content inclusion, please discuss the reasons here. JFHJr (㊟) 03:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * (The article significantly lacked attention that it wouldn't have received through its equally unattended talk page, so I brought the matter to a noticeboard. But is correct about this here being the right place for discussion and BLPN's header advising against this.) &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)